The KCA Methodology: Strategy Before Words.
Writing a 100-page federal grant proposal before verifying whether you can win is the costliest mistake in funding. GMA subjects every opportunity to a 22-factor stress test to protect your capital and maximize award probability.
GMA Key Considerations Analysis™ Sample Scorecard
Project Evaluation: [REDACTED OEM — SEC 48C / MESC] · Federal Award Ceiling: $160,000,000
1. Strategic Alignment (Weight: 30%)
29.1 / 30Scoring against published agency FOA rubrics, statutory executive priorities (Justice40, domestic manufacturing content), and program officer focus areas.
2. Technical Posture (Weight: 25%)
23.8 / 25Evaluation of technology readiness level (TRL 7+), operational milestones, environmental/NEPA permitting timeline, and engineering defensibility.
3. Cost-Share & Financials (Weight: 25%)
23.5 / 25Audit track record, 2 CFR 200 indirect rate structure, and verification of required 50% non-federal matching commitments.
4. Reviewer Competitive Surface (Weight: 20%)
17.0 / 20Scoring against historical peer awardees, likely competitor proposals, political considerations, and anticipated reviewer panel biases.
"Project demonstrates tier-one merit suitability under Title III MESC guidelines. Primary vulnerability identified in Section 4.2 (NEPA Categorical Exclusion timeline). Action required: Pre-engage NEPA liaison 45 days prior to final volume lock. Proceed to Volume I narrative architecture immediately."
Download the Official 1-Page KCA Decision Guide
A concise executive reference summarizing the 22-factor Go/No-Go evaluation framework, scoring weights, and red-team checklist for leadership and grant committees.
- The 22 Go/No-Go evaluation criteria condensed into 1 page
- Red-team reviewer scoring checklist for grant committees
- Cost-share and compliance pre-flight checks
